Category Archives: immigration

Current events, immigration, Uncategorized

Is it Time for a EU style North/South America Union?

Being that the nation we now know as the United States has been built to its present form by the diversity of its citizens, the flow of foreign culture, and the need to improve and sustain. After all, foreign films, music, and television have gone on the rise for American consumption, people choose from multiple ethnic foods, and cultural exhibitions and fairs draw huge crowds. So why is it, that the mention of immigration or open borders causes such a backlash?

Immigration is one of those issues that divides, and not only on an ideological basis. Think about it. Bring up immigration to one who has a more conservative ideology. They will explain the need for harsher border controls, the idea that immigrants will steal American jobs, and tax our social initiatives. The funny part is this. After parking his BMW he will do it while wearing clothes not made in America, watching the World Cup and cheering for Brazil and eating pizza, while in the break room of the local Toyota plant.

I have written here about the issue at the border before. How it is a humanitarian crisis and how America is partly responsible due to its actions throughout the western hemisphere. One way to boost the economies, better the healthcare, create a sustainable workforce, and deal with crime and natural disasters is create a North/South American corridor like the EU. A full open borders policy. And yes, it can be done while still allowing national sovereignty for nations involved.

Like the Eu, every member nation will have officials that speak on their behalf during all negotiations, from crime control to trade deals and health initiatives. So lets look at just a few areas that would be improved by a full western open border and union of nations.

First is the most obvious, the border border. Free flow travel and residence capabilities would make it easier for those fleeing violent area (such as cartel issues in places like Juarez). It would allow for easier logistics to and from areas of natural resources need for manufacturing, faster transport ability for perishables, and vacation income for the areas that rely on the influx of money of visitors.

With this style of union, each member nation will have access to innovations that they would not otherwise have. While intellectual property rights would be retained with the person or business, all member nations would have access to it (by proper agreement with the rights holder). Manufacturing would have a continuous pool of labor, raw materials and better chance of financially sound business. It opens the markets for freer movement and would incorporate all socio-economic and geographical areas and peoples.

In the area of health concerns, especially in areas of most need due to natural disasters, pandemic, etc., Aid would be able to isolate problem health issues and areas as well as render aid more effectively and efficiently. It would be easier for international health monitors to work without jurisdictional problems arising.

In the areas of crime, it would be better as well. While there would be jurisdictional lines and boundaries, if crime crosses a border the quicker ability for joint investigation and apprehension would not have hindrances of going through each country’s version of the US State Department. While local lines would not be overstepped, there would be ready and available cooperation between agencies. It would also allow faster, better equipped, and more manned operations for apprehension and elimination of threats (such as cartels or known terrorist organizations). This also allows for a more powerful response for member nations if attacked by outside forces (such as an attack by Russia or China against any member nation).

And open border and western hemisphere union is not only a way to end a humanitarian crisis, it also aids economically, within the criminal justice initiatives, health concern wise, and militarily.

Despite the hope that America will again rise to its once place of prominence on the global stage, what we are seeing is the same every other great national empire has seen. The fading of this nation into the twilight of its global glory to be placed into same category of the British Empire, the Roman Empire, and yes, even the former grandeur of the Russia of the cold war.

Within the next few decades, we see the rise of areas like China and India rise to take positions on the global stage that the US has held since the middle of the 20th century. The go-it-alone, isolationist mentality will do more to harm the nation than it will do to save it. It is time to start seeing the reality of America’s waning prominence and influence and start putting things into place that will not only save this nation but create a western hemisphere alliance that creates aid, crime control, and economic stability.

Standard
Christianity, Current events, faith, Human Right, immigration

Derechos Humanos y Frontera

La presencia de inmigrantes en la frontera sur de Estados Unidos no es nada nuevo. Tampoco es nueva la respuesta actual. Cuando crecí rodeado de trabajadores del campo inmigrantes en Indiana, vi lo duro que trabajaban estos inmigrantes. Cuando empecé a conocer sus historias cuando me hice mayor, empecé a darme cuenta de que muchos vinieron aquí por lo que percibían como una vida mejor. Incluso cuando yo era más joven, existía la idea errónea de que iban a quitarles el trabajo a los estadounidenses, a cometer delitos y a ser una carga para los sistemas sociales de Estados Unidos.

¿Le resulta familiar? Es la misma retórica que la extrema derecha y Donald Trump utilizaron durante el ciclo electoral de 2016 y que continúa con la población conservadora. Mientras que algunos piensan que la actitud proviene de los prejuicios (y gran parte de ella lo hace), un miedo profundamente arraigado es más la razón. Un miedo al cambio. Un miedo a lo desconocido. Miedos muy arraigados que han sido alimentados por los medios de comunicación, la propaganda política y la incomprensión cultural. Así que este artículo trata de aliviar algo de eso.

No soy tan ingenuo como para creer que un artículo (después de millones de otros) tendría un impacto real. Y este artículo, aunque se dirige al público en general para que lo vea, será esencialmente para la derecha cristiana que se ha desviado del camino en las últimas décadas. Especialmente aquellos que creen que el ex presidente Trump es el salvador elegido para América. Porque en algún punto del camino, mientras el cristiano liberal ha ido aceptando el pecado en sus filas, el cristiano conservador ha olvidado las enseñanzas del Cristo que dicen seguir.

Este artículo será menos “en tu cara” y más educativo. Tendrá en cuenta algunas de las acciones que condujeron a las masas en la frontera sur de EE.UU., el aspecto legal de los que intentan entrar (ya sea por medios legales o simplemente cruzando), los Derechos Humanos, y los principios y la doctrina cristiana. Se trata de una combinación de derechos humanos y de fe cristiana.

Después de ver una reunión online de HIAS, me intrigó cómo se trata a los que buscan una vida mejor en el viaje y en la frontera. Así como el estudio independiente y la investigación sobre las causas principales en las diversas naciones que provocan que estos viajeros se enfrenten al viaje. Porque, seamos sinceros. La intervención en zonas extranjeras por parte de las administraciones estadounidenses ha contribuido a provocar la crisis a la que nos enfrentamos ahora. Y permítanme dejar claro este punto, La crisis no es una afluencia de indeseables, es una crisis HUMANITARIA de la que los EE.UU. son en parte responsables. 

\Según el Centro de Investigación Pew (Gramlich & Scheller, 2021), la mayoría de los que vienen a acceder a los EE.UU. son de áreas que generalmente no llegaron a la frontera en gran número. Entre los años fiscales 2020 y 2021. Lugares como Ecuador, Brasil y Venezuela experimentaron aumentos masivos. Cuba y Haití también están en esa lista, pero se puede hablar de cada uno de ellos por separado. 

Los que buscan escapar de Cuba lo han hecho generalmente por agua. Solía haber una política denominada “pie seco/pie mojado”. En términos simples, si un ciudadano cubano podía llegar a la orilla con una mano antes de ser capturado por la Guardia Costera, lo lograba. No es que pudieran seguir inmediatamente su camino, pero serían recibidos como solicitantes de asilo y se les daría protección a la espera de los resultados de sus solicitudes. Actualmente, Haití ha tenido que recuperarse de catástrofes naturales que estuvieron a punto de eliminar a la población y de asesinatos políticos. Estas dos naciones han tenido una larga historia de sus nacionales en los Estados Unidos.

En el caso de las naciones de América Central y del Sur, las razones por las que desean emigrar a los EE.UU., ya sea a través del asilo o no, se deben a cuestiones como la violencia extrema y los escuadrones/cárteles de la muerte, los fracasos masivos del socialismo, la inseguridad alimentaria, etc. Algo de esto es por lo que he dicho que EEUU ha jugado un papel en los países de origen en relación con la crisis que ahora vemos en la frontera.

Hay que señalar que muchos de los que buscan entrar en EE.UU. desde estas regiones ya tienen familia en el país. Dicho esto, veamos un par de países y las razones por las que deciden viajar a EE.UU. con esperanza.

Miremos a Ecuador. En 2021, hubo 95.692 encuentros con inmigrantes de Ecuador en los EE.UU.. Eso fue un salto de unos 75.000 desde 2020. Si recuerdan, el 2020 fue la aparición del COVID a nivel mundial. Esta crisis sanitaria debilitó una economía ya decaída. La corrupción es rampante, y hubo problemas de violencia extrema.

¿Cómo juega los EE.UU. en esto? Las guerras de la droga y la economía. Estados Unidos y Ecuador han sido socios en la guerra contra los cárteles desde el siglo XX. El resultado fue una violencia extrema para los cárteles, la corrupción de los funcionarios y los escuadrones de la muerte (Gorder, 2022).  A medida que los cárteles crecían financieramente, la economía del país llevó a los funcionarios y a las fuerzas del orden a profundizar en la corrupción. Cosas como dar armas a los cárteles. Imagina ser el objetivo de un escuadrón de la muerte. Y la historia muestra que el objetivo previsto también pone en peligro a la familia y a los amigos. No sólo en el país, sino que puede ocurrir en otros lugares.

Estados Unidos también tiene un interés principal en el petróleo de Ecuador, así como en algunas otras exportaciones como el cacao.

Una mirada rápida directamente al sur de la frontera, en México. Aquí, al igual que muchas naciones al sur de los EE.UU., México tiene un gran problema con los cárteles de la droga. La guerra contra las drogas de Estados Unidos. Y su participación en la lucha contra los cárteles de México ha llevado a expatriados o viajeros estadounidenses a ser atacados y asesinados Thompson, 2017). Así que muchos de los problemas que llevan a estas personas a la frontera de los Estados Unidos fueron impulsados aquí en parte por la participación de los Estados Unidos.

Como dije antes, escucho o veo las reuniones informativas de HIAS. Trabajan con varios refugiados y solicitantes de asilo y trabajan en ambos lados de la frontera. Proporcionan refugio, ayuda sanitaria, prevención de la violencia, ayuda legal, etc. a los que buscan entrar en EE.UU., normalmente como solicitantes de asilo y desplazados (HIAS, 2022).

Hay dos programas que se utilizan para los solicitantes de asilo. El primero es el Protocolo de Protección al Migrante (MMP) o el programa de estancia en México. Esencialmente, este programa fue diseñado para permitir a los migrantes permanecer en México mientras su caso de entrada es escuchado y decidido. Sin embargo, esto los hace vulnerables a ataques y enfermedades. Se sabe que los matones locales o los miembros de los cárteles obtienen información sobre los migrantes que esperan a través de funcionarios locales corruptos. Esto conduce al acoso, al ataque o a algo peor.

El Tribunal Supremo ha determinado que la Administración Biden puede poner fin al MPP en octubre de este año. Pero mientras tanto, las acciones de los funcionarios estatales de EE.UU., como el gobernador Abbott de Texas, han decidido que tomará el asunto en sus propias manos. Ha transportado a los inmigrantes a DC, así como ha llamado a la TXNG para transportar a los inmigrantes de vuelta a los cruces. El problema con esto es simple. LOS INMIGRANTES NECESITAN ESTAR EN SUELO ESTADOUNIDENSE PARA SOLICITAR ASILO.

Esto también es un problema con el Título 42, promulgado por Trump. Originalmente adoptado en la Segunda Guerra Mundial, el Título 42 es un código de salud para evitar que los problemas de salud crucen las fronteras de los Estados Unidos. El ex presidente Trump lo volvió a promulgar para impedir que los inmigrantes portadores de Covid cruzaran la frontera. Sin embargo, lo abarcaba todo y utilizaba la disposición sanitaria para impedir que TODOS los inmigrantes cruzaran la frontera, enfermos o no.

Esta promulgación del Título 42 debía terminar en mayo de este año. En mayo, el juez federal Summerhays, designado para Luisiana por el ex presidente Trump, bloqueó a la Administración Biden para que levantara la orden (García, 2022). Su razonamiento fue la violación del derecho administrativo. ¿Esta violación? El levantamiento del programa causaría “un daño irreparable porque los estados tendrían que gastar dinero en atención médica, aplicación de la ley, educación y otros servicios para los migrantes”.  Se espera que la demanda presentada por el DOJ en el Tribunal de Apelaciones del 5º Circuito sea aceptada y el programa sea levantado. No se sabe cuánto tiempo puede tardar esta sentencia.

Para más detalles sobre los resultados de la permanencia forzada en México y las deportaciones sin audiencia se puede encontrar en la lista de artículos del sitio web de HIAS en https://www.hias.org/tagged/us-border-response. 

Mi creencia es simple. Para aliviar y curar este problema deberíamos tomar una página del libro de la UE. Crear una política de fronteras abiertas desde la punta de América del Sur hasta el punto más septentrional de América del Norte e incluir todas las islas no controladas por Europa en las zonas que rodean estos continentes. Esto permitiría la libre circulación, iniciativas de comercio justo y reforzaría las economías y sociedades de cada uno. Cada país seguiría siendo soberano, pero trabajando juntos para garantizar los derechos humanos y ayudar a la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de los delitos dentro de los límites de esta frontera de la Unión Americana.

La razón por la que llamé a los conservadores cristianos que creen que estas acciones son apropiadas, olvidan las enseñanzas del Antiguo Testamento y las enseñanzas de Cristo.

Y si un extranjero habita con vosotros en vuestra tierra, no lo maltrataréis(LEV 19:33).

Porque tuve hambre, y me disteis de comer; tuve sed, y me disteis de beber: Fui forastero, y me acogisteis; estuve desnudo, y me vestisteis: Estuve enfermo, y me visitasteis: Entonces los justos le responderán diciendo: Señor, ¿cuándo te vimos hambriento y te dimos de comer, o sediento y te dimos de beber? ¿Y cuándo te vimos enfermo, o en la cárcel, y vinimos a ti? Y el Rey responderá y les dirá: En verdad os digo que en cuanto lo hicisteis a uno de estos mis hermanos más pequeños, a mí me lo hicisteis. (Mateo 25:35-40)

Referencias

Los servicios de seguridad corruptos agravan el problema de los asesinatos en Ecuador. InSight Crime. (2022, 1 de junio). Recuperado el 13 de julio de 2022, de https://insightcrime.org/news/corrupt-security-services-worsen-ecuadors-murder-problem/

García, U. J. (2022, mayo 20). Un juez impide que el gobierno de Biden levante la orden de salud pública utilizada para expulsar rápidamente a los migrantes. The Texas Tribune. Obtenido el 13 de julio de 2022, de https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/20/title-42-border-judge-ruling-migrants/

Gramlich, J., & Scheller, A. (2021, 12 de noviembre). Qué es


Standard
Christianity, Current events, faith, Human Right, immigration

Human Rights and the Border

Immigrants on the United States southern border is not anything new. Also not new is the current response. Growing up around migrant field workers in Indiana I saw how hard these immigrants worked. As I started to learn their stories when I got older, I started to realize that many came here for what they perceived as a better life. Even when I was younger, there was the erroneous idea that they would take American jobs, commit crimes, and be a drain on the social systems in the US.

Sound familiar? It is the same rhetoric that the extreme right and Donald Trump used during the 2016 election cycle and continues with the conservative population. While some think the attitude comes from prejudice (and much of it does), a deep seated fear is more the reason. A fear of change. A fear of the unknown. Deep seated fears that have been fed to the American public in media, political propaganda, and cultural misunderstanding. So this article is to try and alleviate some of that.

I am not naive enough to believe that one article (after millions of others) would have any real impact. And this article, while going to the general public for view, will essentially be for the Christian Right that has gone off track over the last few decades. Especially those that believe former President Trump is the chosen savior for America. Because somewhere along the way, while the liberal Christian has been accepting sin into its ranks, the conservative Christian has forgotten the teachings of the Christ they are claiming to follow.

This article will be less ‘in your face’ and more educational. It will take into account some of the actions that led to the masses at the US southern border, the legal aspect of those trying to enter (whether by legal means or just crossing), Human Rights, and Christian principles and doctrine. This is a combination of Human Rights and Christian faith issue.

Having watched a HIAS online meeting, I was intrigued at how those seeking a better life are treated on the journey and at the border. As well as independent study and research on core causes in the various nations that caused these sojourners to face the trip. Because, let’s me honest. The intervention in foreign areas by US administrations has helped lead to the crisis we now face. And let me make this point clear, The crisis is not one of an influx of undesirables, it is a HUMANITARIAN crisis that the US is partly responsible for. 

\According to the Pew Research Center (Gramlich & Scheller, 2021), the majority of those coming to gain access to the US are from areas that generally did not come to the border in large numbers. From 2020 to 2021 fiscal years. Places like Ecuador, Brazil, and Venezuela saw massive increases. Cuba and Haiti are on that list as well, but each of these can be talked about somewhat separately. 

Those seeking to escape Cuba have generally done so by water. There used be a policy named the dry foot/wet foot policy. Is simple terms, if a Cuban national could make it to the shore with one hand before being caught by the Coast Guard, they made it. Not that they could immediately go on their way, but they would be received as asylum seekers and given protection pending the results of their applications. Currently, Haiti has had to recover from natural disasters that came close to eliminating the population and political assassination. This two nations have had a long history of their nationals being in the US.

With the nations of Central and South America, the reasons for wishing to emigrate to the US, either through asylum or not, are because of issues like extreme violence and death squads/cartels, the massive failures of socialism, food insecurities, etc. Some of this is why I said that the US has played a role in countries of origin in relation to the crisis we now see at the border.

It should be pointed out, that many seeking entry to the US from these regions have family already in the US. That being said, Let’s look at a couple countries and the reasons they choose to travel to the US with hope.

Let’s look at Ecuador. In 2021, there were 95,692 encounters with immigrants from Ecuador at the US. That was a jump of about 75,000 since 2020. If you remember, 2020 was the emergence of COVID globally. This health crisis weakened an already down turned economy. Corruption is rampant, and there were issues of extreme violence.

How does the US play into this. The drug wars and economics. The US and Ecuador have been partners int the war against the cartels since the 20th century. This resulted in extreme violence for the cartels, corruption by officials, and death squads (Gorder, 2022).  As the cartels grew financially, the economics of the country led officials and law enforcement to go deeper into corruption. Things such as giving arms to the cartels. Imagine being the target of a death squad. And history shows that the intended target also endangers family and friends. Not only in country, but can happen elsewhere. The US also has a main interest in Ecuador’s petroleum, as well as a few other exports like cocoa.

Just a quick look directly south of the border in Mexico. Here, like many nations south of the US, Mexico has a major issue with drug cartels. The US drug war. And their involvement in fighting the cartels of Mexico has led to US expats or travelers being attacked and killed Thompson, 2017). So many of the issues that drive these people to the US border were driven here in part by the US involvement.

As I said earlier, I listen to or watch HIAS information meetings. They work with various refugees and asylum seekers and work on both sides of the border. They provide shelter, health aid, violence prevention, legal aid, and etc to those seeking entry into the US, usually as asylum seekers and the displaced (HIAS, 2022).

There are 2 programs that is used for those seeking asylum. The first is the Migrant Protection Protocols (MMP) or the stay in Mexico program. Essentially, this program was designed to allow migrants to stay in Mexico while their entry case is being heard and decided. However, this makes them vulnerable to attacks and sickness. Local thugs or cartel members have been known to obtain information on the waiting migrants from corrupt local officials. This leads to harassment, attack or worse.

The Supreme Court has determined that the Biden Administration can end MPP in October of this year. But in the mean time, actions by US state officials, like Gov. Abbott of Texas, have decided that he will take the matter in his own hands. He has transported immigrants to DC as well as called up the TXNG to transport immigrants back to the crossings. The issue with this is simple. THE IMMIGRANTS NEED TO BE ON U.S. SOIL TO APPLY FOR ASYLUM.

This also is an issue with Title 42, enacted by Trump. Originally adopted in WW2, Title 42 is a health code to prevent health issues from crossing the borders of the US. Former President Trump re-enacted this to stall Covid carrying immigrants from crossing the border. However, it was all encompassing and used the health provision to stop ALL immigrants from crossing the border, sick or not.

This enactment of Title 42 was to end in May of this year. In May, Federal Judge Summerhays, appointed to Louisiana by Former President Trump, blocked the Biden Administration from lifting the order (Garcia, 2022). His reasoning was violation of administrative law. This violation? The lifting of the program would cause “irreparable harm because the states would have to spend money on health care, law enforcement, education and other services for migrants”.  It is expected that the suit filed by the DOJ in the 5thCircuit Court of Appeals will be accepted and the program will be lifted. It is undetermined how long this ruling may take.

For further details on the results of forced remain in Mexico and non-hearing deportations can be found at HIAS website article list at https://www.hias.org/tagged/us-border-response. 

My belief is simple. To ease and cure this problem we should take a page from the EU’s book. Create an open border policy from the tip of South America to most northern point of North America and include all non-European controlled islands in the areas surrounding these continents. It would allow free movement, fair trade initiatives, and bolster the economies and societies of each. Each Country still soveriegn, but working together to ensure Human Rights and aid criminal investigation and prosecution within the confines of this American union border.

The reason I called out the Christian Conservatives that believe these actions are appropriate, forget the teachings of the Old Testament and the teachings of Christ.

And if a stranger dwells with you in your land, you shall not mistreat him(LEV 19:33).

For I was an hungry, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungry, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. (Matthew 25:35-40)

References

Corrupt Security Services worsen Ecuador’s murder problem. InSight Crime. (2022, June 1). Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://insightcrime.org/news/corrupt-security-services-worsen-ecuadors-murder-problem/

García, U. J. (2022, May 20). Judge Blocks Biden administration from lifting public health order used to quickly expel migrants. The Texas Tribune. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.texastribune.org/2022/05/20/title-42-border-judge-ruling-migrants/

Gramlich, J., & Scheller, A. (2021, November 12). What’s happening at the U.S.-Mexico border in 7 charts. Pew Research Center. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/09/whats-happening-at-the-u-s-mexico-border-in-7-charts/

HIAS www.hias.org

Thompson, G. (2017, June 12). How the U.S. triggered a massacre in Mexico. ProPublica. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.propublica.org/article/allende-zetas-cartel-massacre-and-the-us-dea

Standard